Morality in Slaughterhouse Five :: Essays Papers

Morality in Slaughterhouse FiveThe demise of Dresden was not righteous, nor is any destruction, really. We as mere mortals do not throw the right to judge what is moral or not, however. That jurisdiction is left to the powers that be. But, we quarter passive make haphazard guesses as to what strikes us as moral and immoral. Killing other humans is not something we were given the authority to do. The essence yes, the will, yes but not the authority. We have no right to decide who lives or dies. Think of it this way, how would you like it if someone decided you should die for something you had done, malicious or not. Events like the utter destruction of Hiroshima or Baghdad, or anywhere else for that matter, ar completely detestable. Despite the fact that the inhabitants of those places had done some things to us that were unacceptable, we still had no right to take the action we took. There is no bonnyify for such action, in that location is almost always an available altern ative to annihilation. Now, Sodom and Gomorrah, on the other hand, were destroyed morally and rightly by the powers that be. The fact that litters wife, and innocent in the matter (despite the fact that she had compassion for the doomed), just happened to make a foolish choice. The cities were destroyed by the powers that be, whether God or the gods, for reasons they saw follow. It would seem the lesson did not take very well. However, this was an exception to the rule. No individual or group of individuals was directly involved in this. Those that were fit to be saved, were, and those unfit for salvation were demolished. With mass killings as undertaken by mortals, there is no determining or innocence or guilt. Innocents are killed on base guilty. Those not even involved are massacred along with the rest. That is not to govern that people should be sorted through, it is just to say that there is no rhyme or reason to it. It is simply senseless killing. The morality of the crusa des is as well in question. Christians (a.k.a.the crusaders) believe in acceptance, forgiveness and universality. However, they proceed to kill those that do not comply with their religion. Am I the only one miss something? It seems to me that people of a religious nature would rather discuss and agree than storm and pillage.