Poor decision making Essay

Poor decision making travail is not confined at the individualist level al 1 but is manifesting itself more(prenominal) and more in geological formations. Employees have choke more vociferous in their demands for a better deal. Various departments in an organization face a situation upright of problems due to a number of reasons equivalent goal diversity, scarcity of resources or task interdependence etc.Management at present is faced with the awesome responsibility of ensuring optimal levels of growth and productivity in an surroundings that is full of participationing situations. Modern passenger vehicle spends everywhere 20% of his beat discourse wizard form of problem or the other.DIFFERENT figureSIt is not at only good to have any troth and the role of a motorbus starts at one time it arises. These are very important points which one tend to answer in one way or the other depending upon the views he   hold to the highest degree  problems.Envir onment factorThe behaviouralists noticeed that since an organization was composed of individual- and they had incompatible perceptions of goals and differing values, problem was bound to arise in the organization. Managers of various departments had separate priorities and remaindering ideas ab unwrap resource in allocation. Hence conflict was the needed outcome. Subordinates may clash with the manager over whether the work can be constituted in the given period of time or not.Social FactorThe sentiment currently prevalent about conflict has been labelled as the interactionist view. In crease to the behaviouralist view which merely accepts conflict as inevitable, the integrationists not only accept conflict but also encourage it. However, they maintain that conflict must he set so that it does not get out of control producing dysfunctional consequences.ECONOMIC doer A large number of possible sources of conflict exist in organizational life as antecedent conditions and true-to-life(prenominal) basis for some conflicts. Any sort exists for the purpose of attaining some goals with the help of forthcoming resources. These resources may be tangible akin men, materials, and money or intangible worry power, status or the managers time. No organization is capable of providing all the resources demanded by various units. Resources are particular and contrasting mathematical groups have to compete for these just now resources and many conflicts arise from this source.TECHNICAL FACTORGroups in organization have different functions to perform and as such they bring on their own norms and goals. Theoretically the winment of these goals should achieve overall organizational goals but, often, in true(a) life the reverse is true. Goals of one group are incompatible to the goals of another group. For example, a company which manufactures electric fans has a seasonal demand. Three departments marketing, production and financeare involved. Since th e demand for the product is seasonal, the marketing manager would like to have sufficient nisus during the season.References Beaumont,P.B., Applied Microeconomics for Decision Making, Sage Publications, London,1993Kaplan , P.L., gay Resources and Personnel Management, McGraw-Hill, youthful York,1997Feldman, D.C., 1985 A taxonomy of intergroup conflict-resolution strategies University AssociatesSan DiegoTaylor Sims, J. Robert Foster, ArchG. Woodside,(1997) market Channels Systems and Strategies Harper and Row New York.