Spoken discourse

SPOKEN DISCOURSE I. INTRODUCTION This essay deals with an instance of a spoken discourse, and tries to analyse wholeness part of it in equipment casualty of synergistic strategies and transfigure procedures, go for its different part it aims at describing it by applying some rules of a grammar of speech to it. The analysed discourse is a part of a television receiver broadcast of a snowboarding big-air jumping competition (Eurosport, February 2001). It foot be divided in three parts: a explanation and two interviews. The observer (referred to as well as as C in the essay) gives a report of the competition as it goes along and as well as informs the television audience close the background of the actual happening. middle(prenominal) at that place ar two short interviews with two of the riders - Leslee Olson (referred to in any case as L in the essay) and Barret Christy (referred to also as B in the essay). They are interviewed by the interviewer (referred to als o as I in the essay), whose job is to catch the riders after their performance and ask them approximately their jumps. This has to be done quickly in coif for the transmittance of the competition to go on as uninterruptedly as possible. Since in the interviews the speakers interact actively, i.e.

they take turns, these two parts pot be analysed according to Anna-Britta Stenstroms theory of conversation set frontward in her book An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. Her description of interactional strategies and exchange procedures should also apply to such short instances of interaction between two parties as are these two interviews. The commentary! , on the other hand, is an example of a spoken discourse where there are no direct responses to what the speaker says. Therefore it cannot be analysed in the same way as the interviews, but has to be described in... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper