Reseach Summaries

Cortland , A (2005 . Paying for friends . Rutgers University : Daily TargumSummaryThe word written by Cortland (2005 ) asserts that there is an implicit misconception that Greek action at Rutgers University is entirely closely fun and on-value adding activities much(prenominal) as partying and getting tickle pink . However the antecedent suggests that there is more to sodality or sorority neighborly status that meets the eye . She asks that these groups give a substantial duty to charitable constitutes for instance , they sponsor the conduct of Derby huge time which has a charitable organization as benefactive role . The author further argues that there is as well as little truth in the belief that connexion fraternities and sororities would cause the scholarly person to be defocused in academic life . On the cont rary , he whitethorn even be more motivated to study since they ar provided with locuss to do so such as study groups . The article speaks to students as audience , as an attempt to debunk the known notion that joining fraternities and sororities will not be beneficial to the student , and may even be harmful to them . The principal(a) thesis of the military man is that fraternities and sororities may do much upright for the student . It accords him with the opportunity to socialize with fellow students , foster an glory of social certificate of indebtedness , allow him to build strong ties inwardly the br setback /sisterhood , and possibly give him the chance to fulfill a leadership post . The author wants to expound on the benefits of social station to these groups , in contrast with the more popular prejudicious beliefsRhetorical CommentaryCortland (2005 ) begins the scrap very casually , with the belief that joining fraternities and sororities pack repercuss ions such as it being too expensive , oddme! nt up in academic failure , and occupying oneself with non-value adding activities . She then capitalizes on the guardianship and begins to factually show the benefits of membership . She cites specific examples to modify belief to his points . For example , on engaging themselves in a worthwhile activity , she cites Derby Days .

Moreover , she in whatever case gives a specific percentage of 2 as a proportion of student s expenses spent on membership fees . These facts ask the piece believable and compelling . The piece withal takings smoothly , with Cortland (2005 not sounding biased about her arguments to t he pro-side of fraternity /sorority membership . She presents the facts as they be convincing the ratifier as he reads along the pieceUtility in My ArgumentThe current piece obviously lends support to the compulsive aspects of fraternity or sorority membership . It may be used to pursue the idea that this has positive outcomes for the student . First , these groups accord the student with a venue for socialising and building camaraderie with fellow students . In improver , these groups are also engaged in corporate social responsibility / philanthropic projects . The student may also articulate a passion for excellence , with group initiatives geared towards this englut . It also may be used to strongly argue that these groups are conducive to developing leadership potential , citing the fleck of presidents and other high-pro leaders who...If you want to get a salutary essay, align it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper