When reading the play 12 angry men, is it threatening to ignore the prominent character- the 8th Juror. As the plot unfolds, the ref notices that Juror #8 is the only one among the 12 who in truth understands the seriousness of the situation at their hands. At the really beginning of the play, you posterior ascertain that there is no liberality towards the son impeach of murder. And why should it be? All the leaven that was brought up in the court room has crushed the defense mechanism and the boys chances on the trial. The criminal prosecution activatede it clear that the boy is guilty. In fact, too clear- The defense was helpless and left umpteen holes in their case. Thats why in the initial vote through with(p) by the jurors, everybody votes guilty (against the boy) overlook for #8. And here we see the low gear importance of #8: because of his valid doubt the jury hadnt entrap the boy guilty at the first 10 legal proceeding of their debating, which would cla im balanceed the trial. #8 did not necessarily confide the boy was innocent, but he understood that if he elevated his hand at that vote- it would totally end. They will not have a chance to discuss the case, and it will, in his eyes, belittle the comfort of human life.
Furthermore, we can see that #8 is a signalize character in many other parts of the play. afterwards starting to talk nigh the case, some of the other jurors got mad and seek to convince #8 to vote guilty and end the discussion. Yet, he stayed calm and tried to continue debating in rancor of their efforts to convert him. After realizing that he is s tanding alone against them, he called for an! other vote, in which he will not participate... If you loss to get a expert essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment